
| 2016 | |
|---|---|
| Criterium: | Position: |
| Overall Score: | 100-200 |
| Total Project Funding per Partner: | 100-200 |
| Total Number of Projects: | 200-300 |
| Networking Rank (Reputation): | 100-200 |
| 2015 | |
| Criterium: | Position: |
| Overall Score: | 500-600 |
| Total Project Funding per Partner: | 62 |
| Total Number of Projects: | 71 |
| Networking Rank (Reputation): | 91 |
| Partner Constancy: | 100-200 |
| Project Leadership Index: | 700-800 |
| 2014 | |
| Criterium: | Position: |
| Overall Score: | 100-200 |
| Total Project Funding per Partner: | 63 |
| Total Number of Projects: | 84 |
| Networking Rank (Reputation): | 100-200 |
| Partner Constancy: | 100-200 |
| Project Leadership Index: | 300-400 |
| Diversity Index: | 67 |
| 2013 | |
| Criterium: | Position: |
| Overall Score: | 53 |
| Total Project Funding per Partner: | 43 |
| Total Number of Projects: | 32 |
| Total Project Funding: | 46 |
| Partner Constancy: | 35 |
| Project Leadership Index: | 34 |
| Diversity Index: | 21 |
| 2012 | |
| Criterium: | Position: |
| Overall Score: | 100-200 |
| Total Project Funding per Partner: | 58 |
| Total Number of Projects: | 49 |
| Total Project Funding: | 100-200 |
| Networking Rank (Reputation): | 100-200 |
| Networking Rank (Reputation): | 100-200 |
| Partner Constancy: | 38 |
| Project Leadership Index: | 31 |
| Diversity Index: | 33 |
| 2011 | |
| Criterium: | Position: |
| Overall Score: | 63 |
| Total Project Funding per Partner: | 30 |
| Total Number of Projects: | 72 |
| Total Project Funding: | 42 |
| Networking Rank (Reputation): | 77 |
| Partner Constancy: | 200-300 |
| Project Leadership Index: | 100-200 |
| Diversity Index: | 200-300 |
| 2010 | |
| Criterium: | Position: |
| Overall Score: | 59 |
| Total Project Funding per Partner: | 34 |
| Total Number of Projects: | 26 |
| Total Project Funding: | 37 |
| Networking Rank (Reputation): | 35 |
| Partner Constancy: | 69 |
| Project Leadership Index: | 100-200 |
| Diversity Index: | > 1000 |
| 2009 | |
| Criterium: | Position: |
| Overall Score: | 100-200 |
| Total Project Funding per Partner: | 54 |
| Total Number of Projects: | 100-200 |
| Total Project Funding: | 100-200 |
| Networking Rank (Reputation): | 100-200 |
| Partner Constancy: | 400-500 |
| Project Leadership Index: | 65 |
| Diversity Index: | > 1000 |
| 2008 | |
| Criterium: | Position: |
| Overall Score: | 53 |
| Total Project Funding per Partner: | 20 |
| Total Number of Projects: | 28 |
| Total Project Funding: | 39 |
| Networking Rank (Reputation): | 45 |
| Partner Constancy: | 87 |
| Project Leadership Index: | 100-200 |
| Diversity Index: | > 1000 |
| 2007 | |
| Criterium: | Position: |
| Overall Score: | 100-200 |
| Total Project Funding per Partner: | 100-200 |
| Total Number of Projects: | 100-200 |
| Total Project Funding: | 100-200 |
| Networking Rank (Reputation): | 100-200 |
| Partner Constancy: | > 1000 |
| Project Leadership Index: | 100-200 |
| Diversity Index: | 700-800 |
Total number of projects: 165
As coordinator: 9
As participant: 145
Sole participant: 11
Coordinator / Participant Ratio: 0.06*
| Total project funding [€]: | Projects [No]: | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year: | coordinator* | participant* | per partner | as coordinator | as participant | |
| 2016 | 264.668 | 6.579.853 | 6.844.521 | 1 | 4 | |
| 2015 | 1.283.088 | 9.993.164 | 1.882.566 | 1 | 3 | |
| 2014 | 368.781 | 43.571.396 | 11.224.781 | 2 | 13 | |
| 2013 | 16.527.620 | 197.292.691 | 22.352.119 | 10 | 39 | |
| 2012 | 0 | 91.166.912 | 11.548.500 | 21 | ||
| 2011 | 1.850.000 | 166.279.386 | 8.158.539 | 1 | 24 | |
| 2010 | 11.764.518 | 170.064.707 | 18.380.784 | 5 | 41 | |
Total number of partners: 2082
Partner loyalty:
Frequent Partner: (> 2 projects): 1002
Rare Partner: 1080
Frequent / Rare Partner Ratio: 0.93