2017 | |
---|---|
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 71 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 62 |
Total Number of Projects: | 52 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | 100-200 |
2016 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 77 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 52 |
Total Number of Projects: | 79 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | 100-200 |
2015 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 500-600 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 74 |
Total Number of Projects: | 73 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | 78 |
Partner Constancy: | 100-200 |
Project Leadership Index: | 600-700 |
2014 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 29 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 27 |
Total Number of Projects: | 22 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | 25 |
Partner Constancy: | 100-200 |
Project Leadership Index: | 56 |
Diversity Index: | 100-200 |
2013 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 21 |
Total Project Funding: | 25 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 17 |
Total Number of Projects: | 22 |
Partner Constancy: | 43 |
Project Leadership Index: | 15 |
Diversity Index: | 23 |
2012 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 43 |
Total Project Funding: | 40 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 23 |
Total Number of Projects: | 29 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | 66 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | 66 |
Partner Constancy: | 38 |
Project Leadership Index: | 16 |
Diversity Index: | 23 |
2011 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 58 |
Total Project Funding: | 37 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 49 |
Total Number of Projects: | 47 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | 59 |
Partner Constancy: | 100-200 |
Project Leadership Index: | 100-200 |
Diversity Index: | 400-500 |
2010 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 76 |
Total Project Funding: | 65 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 57 |
Total Number of Projects: | 78 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | 100-200 |
Partner Constancy: | 300-400 |
Project Leadership Index: | 13 |
Diversity Index: | 400-500 |
2009 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 62 |
Total Project Funding: | 55 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 59 |
Total Number of Projects: | 52 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | 47 |
Partner Constancy: | 200-300 |
Project Leadership Index: | 100-200 |
Diversity Index: | 300-400 |
2008 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 47 |
Total Project Funding: | 57 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 57 |
Total Number of Projects: | 63 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | 81 |
Partner Constancy: | 100-200 |
Project Leadership Index: | 53 |
Diversity Index: | 100-200 |
2007 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 100-200 |
Total Project Funding: | 68 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 100-200 |
Total Number of Projects: | 100-200 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | 200-300 |
Partner Constancy: | 200-300 |
Project Leadership Index: | 75 |
Diversity Index: | 800-900 |
Total funding allocated to projects this organisation participated or coordinated
Since 2014 individual funding per partner. If data is not available at CORDIS: total funding / No of participants.
Total number of projects: 607
As coordinator: 54
As participant: 447
Sole participant: 106
Coordinator / Participant Ratio: 0.12*
*Ratio includes only projects with > 2 partners
Total project funding [€]: | Projects [No]: | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year: | coordinator* | participant* | per partner | as coordinator | as participant | |
2019 | 3.926.510 | 18.295.830 | 5.711.895 | 2 | 5 | |
2018 | 76.908.486 | 76.480.115 | 40.082.116 | 13 | 12 | |
2017 | 5.847.117 | 93.350.722 | 16.999.074 | 11 | 23 | |
2016 | 18.586.127 | 144.235.702 | 21.108.599 | 11 | 17 | |
2015 | 1.491.638 | 153.673.069 | 17.480.511 | 8 | 27 | |
2014 | 8.496.650 | 93.396.318 | 20.615.979 | 11 | 23 | |
2013 | 21.984.053 | 247.626.555 | 36.754.047 | 18 | 45 | |
2012 | 28.703.094 | 140.205.953 | 30.932.450 | 16 | 36 | |
2011 | 12.378.327 | 189.724.423 | 19.162.913 | 8 | 36 | |
2010 | 27.049.994 | 123.932.025 | 21.122.169 | 13 | 22 | |
2009 | 7.837.498 | 120.193.304 | 9.937.573 | 6 | 25 | |
2008 | 17.102.262 | 114.504.326 | 10.725.683 | 7 | 22 | |
2007 | 11.147.274 | 36.038.303 | 2.338.056 | 3 | 4 | |
2006 | 987.471 | 123.041.260 | 8.979.037 | 3 | 28 | |
2005 | 3.680.322 | 132.595.462 | 5.771.289 | 5 | 21 | |
2004 | 15.269.131 | 162.253.928 | 9.552.095 | 5 | 29 | |
2003 | 0 | 26.245.086 | 1.124.788 | 5 | ||
2002 | 4.633.928 | 21.254.653 | 3.502.318 | 7 | 17 | |
2001 | 6.717.981 | 33.536.667 | 5.455.357 | 6 | 21 | |
2000 | 7.780.411 | 57.340.896 | 7.078.196 | 7 | 29 |
Total number of partners:6875
Partner loyalty:
Frequent Partner: (> 2 projects): 3788
Rare Partner: 3087
Frequent / Rare Partner Ratio: 1.23
Category: | No: |
---|---|
BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES | 220 |
RTD HORIZONTAL TOPICS | 219 |
SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC CONCERNS | 168 |
INDUSTRY AND TECHNOLOGY | 92 |
PROTECTING MAN AND HIS ENVIRON | 50 |
AGRICULTURE AND MARINE RESOURC | 20 |
PHYSICAL AND EXACT SCIENCES | 9 |
MEASUREMENTS AND STANDARDS | 7 |
ENERGY | 6 |